[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: lojban-list Digest V4 #181
This is probably a repost, and it's my fault. Sorry.
-Robin
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:31:54PM -0400, Christopher Zervic wrote:
> On 8/26/05, Aleksej R. Serdyukov <deletesoftware@yandex.ru> wrote:
> > Brandon Wirick wrote:
>
> > > A neat, simple, meaningful, conformist, modern-looking flag might just
> > > be three vertical bars: black, grey, white.
> >
> > I was watching at these two... (see attach) and thought the vertical one
> > is ugly (update: maybe no more so ;-) ), and the horizontal resembles
> > the German flag (and Russian if
> > reversed).
> > Then I thought - a flag can be ugly. What shouldn't be ugly is ????
> > (heraldry or sth.). (Your jbocpi looks like a ????, and when I saw it
> > first, I've checked if it was the Klingon logo ;-) A logo of something
> > called "Claw" among some Star Trek pictures was similar... IIRC)
>
>
> I had another idea, in which the three-dot "therefore" symbol was
> employed, or some other symbol associated with predicate logic was
> used (NOT lambda - "logos" - as this has other gayer connotations)
> set in whatever colors and however displayed. They could be three
> circles, evoking the rings of a 3-set Venn diagram. No one would
> recognize the 2-set Venn diagram as such
>
> The current "flag" is too MS Painty for me to take seriously.
> --
> Christopher Zervic, Esq.
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.