[lojban] Re: "explicit" and "imply"

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 02:15:42PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> On 12/3/05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > The "point" thing reminds me: there seems to be no word(s) for
> > "explicit" and "implication".
> >
> >    ex??plic??it (??k-spl??s'??t)
> >    adj.
> >
> >    Fully and clearly expressed; leaving nothing implied.
> >    Fully and clearly defined or formulated.
> 
> How about {se mulsku}?

That seems pretty good.  Thanks.

> I also thought of these:
> 
>  cijycau: x1 is plain/explicit/without folds.
>  tolplo: x1 unfolds/makes x2 plain/explicit at locus/on issue x3.
> 
> but I bet you won't like them :)

This time, rather than being disgusted, I'm merely confused.  What
on earth does polje have to do with anything?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.