[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: cmevla a class of brivla



John E Clifford wrote:

That's irrelevant; I don't like proposing
changes to the language
when what's there isn't broken.

But whether it is broken depends upon where you
draw the line; betsemes' examples look close to
that line on almost any definition of "broken"
(short of "Can't say it at all") and way over it
on some. Since what happens between {la} and the
next significant pause is pretty open, both in
form and interpretation, we need not to the
overly analytic version for "Little John,"  but
the predicate case seems to have no obvious
alternative (well, hooking {lai kraislr} on at
the end by some BAI, rather than by {me} in the
predication directly -- but that is not on the
present topic).

N.B., in betsemes' case (la poi cmalu djan.) there is a mandatory and "significant" pause before {djan}, or else we're dealing with a cmene {poicmaludjAN}. Not pausing before cmene is permitted only directly after la/lai/doi.

~mark



To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.