[lojban] Re: Why is this ungrammatical?

[Yanis Batura <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

01.02.2006, 18:25 Jorge Llambías wrote:

> On 2/1/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:
>> *roda rode zo'u lonu da gasnu lonu de morsi kei kei  du lonu da catra de
>> (If X acts so that Y is dead, that is the same thing as X kills Y)
>>
>> jbofi'e spits at this. Why?

> A prenex has to be followed by a bridi, and there is no bridi there.
> Replace {kei kei} with {cu} and it should work.

> {lo (nu da gasnu lo (nu de morsi kei) kei) du} is a sumti.

In this case, why {mi du do} is grammatical?




To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.