[lojban] Re: sumti with relative clause

[John E Clifford <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

Insofar as Lojban follows Logic (and I think it
does here), a relative clauses attaches to the
shortest complete sumti preceding, in this case
to {la djil}.  To attach to {ro na'ebo la djil},
that sumti would have to be completed, in this
case by whatever closes off this sort of sumti
{ku}?) before the {noi}.

--- Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net> wrote:

> coi rodo
> 
> Playing jboselkei, I was to comment the
> translation containing {ro 
> nae'bo la djil noi zutse}. I am in doubt
> whether {noi zutse} applies 
> only to {la djil} (as author of translation
> assumes) or to the whole 
> sumti {ro na'ebo la djil} (as I guess)? Jbofi'e
> output is opaque.
> 
> Which version is correct?
> 
> co'o mi'e kir
> 
> -- 
> Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net>
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
> lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to
> http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to
> secretary@lojban.org for help.
> 
> 



To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.