[lojban] Re: X-bar, chomsky and lojban

["Jorge Llambías" <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 5/16/06, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you mean X-bar theory in its most generic sense (= headed phrases) then
> IMO the answer is: Basically yes, but iff elided terminators are syntactically
> present even though unpronounced.  (The terminator would be head of the
> phrase it terminates.)

Is there any reason to prefer the terminator to the "initiator" of the phrase
as head?

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.