[lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all}

["Jorge Llambías" <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 5/28/06, Alex Martini <alexjm@umich.edu> wrote:
>  > lu'o le and lu'o lo are very useful concepts, even without
> explicit numbers, and there are shorter ways of saying each
>  > when no number comes between them: lei and loi respectively.
>
> Is this still true? I'm not quite up to speed on the xorlo changes
> per the byfy yet.

This is basically true, as a rough description. But you cannot always
replace {lu'o le} with {lei}. For example, {lu'o le mlatu .e le gerku}
is not the same as {lei mlatu .e le gerku}, because {lu'o} takes the
whole connected sumti as its argument. {lu'o le mlatu .e le gerku}
would be {le mlatu joi le gerku}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.