[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all}




On Jun 9, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Jorge Llambías wrote:

On 6/9/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
 For
example, I think that the following is grammatical under your rules,
but I find the interpretation infeasible (or awkward), since it uses
both "markers":

lu'o ro lo tadni cu sruri lo dinju

For me that's equivalent to {lu'o lo ro lo tadni} and it marks the slot that the sumti fills as non-distributive. It is only the outermost marker
that concerns the distributivity of the slot.


Could someone explain the use of {lo} twice here? I've never seen such a thing
before, and would have expected it to be ungrammatical.

ki'e mu'o mi'e .aleks.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.