[lojban] Re: bo, i, and ni'o

[Pierre Abbat <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Tuesday 01 August 2006 19:29, Adam COOPER wrote:
> After running into this problem a few times, I concluded that {bo} is a
> connector dependent on the previous statement. Two statements connected by
> a {bo} are kind of like a single sentence. E.g.
>
> mi pensi i se ni'i bo mi zasti
> I think, therefore I am.
>
> So the dependence requires the {.i} which at least implies a previous
> statement, & precludes the {ni'o} because a sentence can't spill over into
> a new paragraph.

So why can't we connect two paragraphs with {bazibo}?

phma


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.