[lojban] Re: bumru

[Dmitry <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

Yanis Batura wrote:
> The second means not fog itself, but the liquid, of which fog is composed.
>
> Wouldn't it be better that {bumru} had another definition:
>
> "x1 is fog covering consisting of x2 and covering x3"
>
>   
Maybe, it would be better to say about fog itself  "bumru vacri" ?

PS Checked the message twice befope posting....


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.