Robin Lee Powell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:27:09PM -0500, Hugh O'Byrne wrote:Wow. I spend time addressing point after point, and then find the bullseye which makes all the rest irrelavent. On 11/9/06, Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:If my expressions get people so pissed off at me that they don't want to talk about LOkadin any more, then my purposes will be served.There you have it, from the horse's mouth, folks. Bob will disregard the rules of the language,
Not at all. (It is NOT "disregarding the rules of the language" to say that I don't approve of experimentation with disruptive orthographic unconventionality which may be technically permitted but which several have said make the text unreadable, and which offers nothing to make up for this).
he will even disregard the welfare of this community,
Wrong. The welfare of the community lies in common effort, not distractions.
just so that he can have his way.
My way? Not hardly. The community's way.
He said *about*, not *to*. He wants the lokadin discussion to end because it's pointless, that's all.
Thanks, Robin. That is precisely why I have posted. lojbab To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.