[lojban] Re: livejournal discrimination

[Timothy Hobbs <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> writes:

> Hugh O'Byrne wrote:
>> I know that's what he said.  The welfare of the community I referred
>> to is not 'being on speaking terms with LOkadin', but 'accomodating
>> polite debate even in the face of differing individuals' opinions'.
>>
>>       He wants the lokadin discussion to end
>>     because it's pointless, that's all. 
>>
>>
>> That's *not* what he said.  He wants the discussion to end because
>> the discussion doesn't serve his purposes.
>
> I want discussion to end because the discussion doesn't serve the
> community purposes.  I don't have any purposes independent of the
> community purposes; those who know the history are quite aware of
> this.
>
> Don't you think that maybe in 26 years of working on Loglan/Lojban,
> and 16 years leading the effort and the community, that I have gotten
> a little experience in recognizing when a counterproductive debate has
> started and indeed gone on too long?
and thus you join one side.  ASS. Don't say that you have experience leading, for being boastful is a thing that a good leader never 
does.  And, what is productive?  This debate, is infact, probably making it so that lojbanists are thinking about lojban more.  If it infact so counterproductive, then why do people continue it?  If you want the debate to stop, you need only to not reply to this email.
>
> lojbab
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.