[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: "la" rule
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:02:28PM -0500, Robert McIvor wrote:
>
> On 13 Nov, 2006, at 19:49, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:45:21PM -0500, Robert McIvor wrote:
> >>
> >>On 13 Nov, 2006, at 17:36, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> >>
> >>>Robert McIvor wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>And the rule was altered to cover the LaPlace situation. I
> >>>>believe the current solution allows unambiguous parsing of
> >>>>names (in Loglan), and has only the restriction that names
> >>>>end with a consonant and a pause.
> >>>I'm still not fully understanding how the new Loglan rule
> >>>covers all cases. What about someone named, say {parmalagan}?
> >>>Is {la parmalagan} a single person, or is it {la parma la gan},
> >>>two sumti, the first being LA on a hypothetical predicate
> >>>{parma}?
> >>
> >>la parmalagan would be la Parmalagan, because la parma would
> >>need to be followed by a pause to be la parma la gan
> >
> >Why is that, exactly? That wasn't mentioned in your full
> >description.
>
> There has to be a pause after a name, whether a predicate used as
> a name or a proper name. This signals the end of the name. The
> pause is before the second la. I presume when a predicate is
> used with la, it is intended to specify a particular instance of
> that predicate.
Aaaaah. You didn't mention that part. That makes a huge
difference.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.