[lojban] Re: "la" rule

[John E Clifford <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

I thought {lai} could take stress only if explicitly marked by {ba'e}.  That there would also be
stress on {tl} I pass over as obvious.

--- Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

> John E Clifford wrote:
> (I don't think  the {lAItl} can be read as a sumti {lai tl}).
> 
> Yes it can.
> 
> la steven. lai tl. klama
> 
> could mean that Steven is going to the Tulls.
> 
> Reminding you of the olden days, my criticism of JCB's rules focused on 
> the mathematician "LaPlace" (this was mentioned in my review of the last 
> edition of Loglan 1)
> 
> lojbab
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.
> 
> 



To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.