[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: a use for {-bu'i}
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [lojban] Re: a use for {-bu'i}
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:18:32 -0300
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WMRQXUxIFfejvmeYMlhm52/c0uAHBAT5SAVZDS3IgLFDA0xzhAaMNfr702Bhvtjx/UvNgutDgs7OqnGL5WfAJdTJHY13/H7Htp6V11la2iYx6Tr1PhNx7x0SxBNoB804YgX43Bxt9V+ca25ptA17THvbsLHEKev6WmWYC4WSCyw=
- In-reply-to: <200707202343.08384.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- References: <200707202343.08384.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Reply-to: jjllambias@gmail.com
On 7/21/07, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
I though of a useful word with the rafsi {bu'i} in it: {bivbu'ijge}. E.g. {gau
ko bivbu'ijge le vi skori}.
I guess, although perhaps {bivjge} would work just as well. It is not
clear that the pronoun {bi bu} is closer than the number {bi} to the
figure "8". Or perhaps {bivjge} suggests {jgena be bi da}?
Normally I'd call a figure 8 {me'o bi}, but {me'o} has no rafsi.
{me'o bi} could presumably also be "VIII", "eight", "bi" or any other
expression that refers to the number eight, but I suppose "8" is the
most likely one.
(Would a {bivbu'ijge} be different from a {ci'i bu zei jgena}?)
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.