On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
Someone tried to do:
rlpowell@chain> echo "panzi be ny ci mei" | camxes
text
BRIVLA
gismu: panzi
This doesn't work because it needs boi:
rlpowell@chain> echo "panzi be ny boi ci mei" | camxes
text
selbri3
|- tanruUnit1
| |- BRIVLA
| | gismu: panzi
| |- linkargs1
| |- CMAVO
| | BE: be
| |- sumti6
| |- CMAVO
| | BY: ny
| |- CMAVO
| BOI: boi
|- tanruUnit2
|- CMAVO
| PA: ci
|- CMAVO
MOI: mei
Why is that? Because otherwise it forms a "lerfu string".
rlpowell@chain> echo "panzi be ny ci" | camxes
text
tanruUnit1
|- BRIVLA
| gismu: panzi
|- linkargs1
|- CMAVO
| BE: be
|- lerfuString
|- CMAVO
| BY: ny
|- CMAVO
PA: ci
Which is useful for ... I dunno, reading out license plates? -_-
Does anyone remember why this is a fundamental type? I'm guessing
"complicated mekso shit", but I can't even think of any examples
there.
All the grammatical productions that use it:
sumti-6 <- ZO-clause free* / ZOI-clause free* / LOhU-clause free* / lerfu-string !MOI-clause BOI-clause? free* / LU-clause text LIhU-clause? free* / (LAhE-clause free* / NAhE-clause BO-clause free*) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU-clause? free* / KOhA-clause free* / LA-clause free* relative-clauses? CMENE-clause+ free* / (LA-clause / LE-clause) free* sumti-tail KU-clause? free* / li-clause
tanru-unit-2 <- BRIVLA-clause free* / GOhA-clause RAhO-clause? free* / KE-clause free* selbri-3 KEhE-clause? free* / ME-clause free* (sumti / lerfu-string) MEhU-clause? free* MOI-clause? free* / (number / lerfu-string) MOI-clause free* / NUhA-clause free* mex-operator / SE-clause free* tanru-unit-2 / JAI-clause free* tag? tanru-unit-2 / NAhE-clause free* tanru-unit-2 / NU-clause NAI-clause? free* (joik-jek NU-clause NAI-clause? free*)* subsentence KEI-clause? free*
operand-3 <- quantifier / lerfu-string !MOI-clause BOI-clause? free* / NIhE-clause free* selbri TEhU-clause? free* / MOhE-clause free* sumti TEhU-clause? free* / JOhI-clause free* mex-2+ TEhU-clause? free* / gek operand gik operand-3 / (LAhE-clause free* / NAhE-clause BO-clause free*) operand LUhU-clause? free*
lerfu-string <- lerfu-word (PA-clause / lerfu-word)*
; ** BU clauses are part of BY-clause
lerfu-word <- BY-clause / LAU-clause lerfu-word / TEI-clause lerfu-string FOI-clause
free <- SEI-clause free* (terms CU-clause? free*)? selbri SEhU-clause? / SOI-clause free* sumti sumti? SEhU-clause? / vocative relative-clauses? selbri relative-clauses? DOhU-clause? / vocative relative-clauses? CMENE-clause+ free* relative-clauses? DOhU-clause? / vocative sumti? DOhU-clause? / (number / lerfu-string) MAI-clause / TO-clause text TOI-clause? / xi-clause
xi-clause <- XI-clause free* (number / lerfu-string) BOI-clause? / XI-clause free* VEI-clause free* mex VEhO-clause?
The xi stuff is particularily 0.o
-Robin
--
http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.