RE: [lojban] po'u considered harmful

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la kreig cusku di'e

> Unless {ko'a goi lei ci broda}, because then {lei ci broda du le ci broda} 
> -
> which I assume you are going to agree with.

No, I don't. The mass of three is not equal to each of the three.
Even if you take {lei ci broda} as {pisu'o lei ci broda}, which
I don't, it is still false that some part of the mass is equal
to each of the three. In the pisu'o case though it is true that
{le ci broda du piusu'o lei ci broda}, each of the three is equal
to some part of the mass. But the order of the quantifiers is
relevant!

> Since part of the mass that is
> ko'a is the pamai broda, the whole mass has the property of being the pamai
> broda; the same goes for the remai and cimai.

The whole mass does not have all the properties of its parts,
only some of them.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com