[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prolog continued: event abstractions in.
- To: bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
- Subject: Re: Prolog continued: event abstractions in.
- From: nsn (Nick Nicholas)
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1993 18:35:22 +1000 (EST)
- Cc: nsn (Nick Nicholas)
The Seraphim surely rejoiced when bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu spoke thus:
}Your reports are fascinating.
}Many thanks for sending them. Please keep it up.
Well, my thanks! The stuff I've been doing is, for the most part, common/garden
variety Logical Form NLP, with little understanding going on, and I'll have
to eventually start doing stuff to put that understanding in there (I don't
know if I'll ask the things questions in a database sense or a narrative
sense). Meantime, I'm reading up on Logic and NLP, grappling with the
nastinesses of Prolog (not that clean a language), and occasionally triumphing
for brief flashes, long enough for me to post them to lojlist! :)
}I would welcome even more discussion and commentary, but I suspect
}you don't have much time for that!
You're not too far wrong, I'm afraid :( ... In fact, the main reason I post
the stuff is to invite anyone who knows more than me to pounce on me if
appropriate. Pretty soon I'll have the guts of the logical form in place
(though tense will prove very tricky); it's then that the real fun will
begin :)
Thanks for your support; I'll certainly keep at it!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nick S. Nicholas, "Rode like foam on the river of pity
CogSci & CompSci student, Turned its tide to strength
University of Melbourne, Australia. Healed the hole that ripped in living"
nsn@{munagin.ee|mundil.cs}.mu.oz.au - Suzanne Vega, Book Of Dreams
______________________________________________________________________________