[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TECH: Quantifiers (was: cukta)
la xorxes. cusku di'e
> If {ro lo broda} is the same as {ro lo broda be zo'e}, is it also
> the same as {ro lo broda be BAI zo'e}?
I think not quite. The latter claims that the broda-ing is BAI-ed
by something, so it is more restrictive than the former. In other words,
{ro lo broda be BAI zo'e} can only refer to BAI-ed broda-ers.
> This keeps the veridicality
> of {lo}, while permiting a context sensitive {ro}. I like it, but
> I don't think this is how {ro} is usually explained.
Sorry, I didn't understand this bit.
mi'e .i,n.