[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH: "any" & quantification



Jorge cusku di'e:

>> By the way, is "xa'a" as I've defined it the same as asserting existence?
>
>Does {mi viska lo pavyseljirna} assert existance, or the fact that there
>are no unicorns makes the sentence false?

How can "I can look at a unicorn" possibly be true statement, unless I
exist, and at least one unicorn exists?  That's why I think useful
transparent statements with the hypothetical "xa'a" have to implicitly
assert existence.

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Chris Bogart
 cbogart@quetzal.com
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~