[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: admirers of 50% of symphonies



I can try to do my 3 meanings in rough pred.calc. form:
"I met every admirer of 50% of B's symphonies"

(3) Ax [Ey [y is a set containing 50% of B's symphonies]
    & [Az [z is a member of y] -> x admires z]] -> I met x
(2) Ey [y is a set containing 50% of B's symphonies]
    & [Ax [Az [z is a member of y] -> x admires z] -> I met x]
(1) Ey [y is a set containing 50% of B's symphonies]
    & [Az [z is a member of y] Ax [x admires z] -> I met z]

Ignore my previous explanations of what I wanted to say, and try these.

> > > >  (1) Each admirer admires some but not necessarily each of this 50%
> > > >      of symphonies
>
> lei neltce be pisu'o le pimu lei zgikrsimfoni,a
> The admirers of at least part of the half of the symphonies.

I meant "be pisuho **lo** pimu lei Z".
But this doesn't work. I want the additional meaning that 50% of B's
symphonies are such that I met lei admirers of either of them. A context
in which I met admirers of #2 & admirers of #2 fits what I mean, but
not a context in which I met only admirers of #2.

> > > >  (2) Each admirer admires each of the same 50%
>
> lei neltce be le pimu lei zgikrsimfoni,a
> The admirers of the half of the symphonies.

I don't have a specific half in mind. I want "There are entities
constituting 50% of B's symphonies such that I met lei people
who admire each of them".

You offer this, for this meaning:
  {lo neltce be piro lo pimu lei zgikrsimfoni,a}
But to me this means that each admirer admires eaho  osbydfeet5%-ie nepeain()
>>>> 3 ahamrramrsec fapsil ifrn 0

 e eteb iulizirifn,
 h dieso afo h ypois
O.S 3 stemaigyugtfr"e eteb opm e "
o  edt nwhwt e htImatfr()&()
>>Adi n ft cssdIhvenmn  scfc      ^<notnt yo  en i oeo h ae">>sbe fsmhne nmn.
--Ad