Re: [lojb

[dex@SYSLINK.MCS.COM]

 > Prolog might be appropriate -- but there's been a lot of progress
 > in the Logical Programming Languages field since its release, too. 
 > Someday I'll get enough time to actually read up on that --
 > hopefully after this set of finals is over.

 Time there is never enough of; or rather it's infinite, but
 we use it up at transfinite rates. 

 Just in case I get some myself, though, what would you recommend
 I read to come back up to speed?