[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lojban analogies and kennings; also "pe'a/po'a"
- Subject: Re: Lojban analogies and kennings; also "pe'a/po'a"
- From: Ron Hale-Evans <rwhe@apocalypse.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 17:34:52 -0700
Thanks for your response, Jorge!
>From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
>
>>From: Ron Hale-Evans <rwhe@apocalypse.org>
>>
>> L1. menske : menli :: ji'eske : xadni
>>
>> L2. .i ke menske tai menli ke'e tai ke ji'eske tai xadni ke'e
>>
>> L3. .i menske du menli ji'eske
<snip>
>L2 is ungrammatical. The cmavo of selmaho BAI, like {tai},
>can be used to tag a sumti or a selbri, much like tenses.
>They don't work as connectives by themselves. You might
>say something like:
>
> zo menske peki'i zo menli zo ji'eske peki'i zo xadni panra
> {menske} in relationship to {menli} is parallel to
> {ji'eske} in relationship to {xadni}.
Thanks. I don't want to talk about the words, though; I want to talk
about abstract things. How about this?
lo menske peki'i lo menli cu panra lo ji'eske peki'i lo xadni
What is "peki'i", BTW? Some kind of compound cmavo? I couldn't find
"peki'i", "pek", "pe" or "ki'i" in any wordlist or the Red Book.
>>I'm pretty sure L3 is ungrammatical; what's wrong with it?
>
>It is grammatical, but it doesn't say what you want.
>It is a four component tanru. {du} is just another brivla,
>like {menske}, {menli} and {ji'eske}. You might say:
>
> zo menske cu munsi'u lu menli ji'eske li'u
> {menske} has the same meaning as {menli ji'eske}.
What about this?
lo menske cu du lo menli ji'eske pe'a
I'm using "pe'a" according to the Red Book. The _online_ Refgram,
whose usage I prefer in this instance, would seem to want me to say:
lo menske cu du lo pe'a menli ji'eske po'a
If anybody's listening (Lojbab? John C.?), I think the latter grammar
is more generally useful, since it lets you mark whole tanru or even
sentences as figurative, whereas the Red Book _seems_ to imply that
you can only mark the previous word.
If "pe'a" and "po'a" conflict with "lo", which is veridical, how about this:
lo menske cu du pe'a lo menli ji'eske po'a
Again, something you can't do with "pe'a" alone.
--Ron
--
Ron Hale-Evans: rwhe@apocalypse.org & http://www.apocalypse.org/~rwhe/
Center for Ludic Synergy & "Kennexions" Glass Bead Game
& Hexagram-8 I Ching Mailing List & State-Specific Sciences List &
Positive Revolution FAQ