[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anselmisms and gadro
- Subject: Re: Anselmisms and gadro
- From: A Rosta <a.rosta@uclan.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:47:00 +0100
> >I think that's only one use of {ko'a}; that is, not all {ko'a}s need
be
> >bound in a goi phrase. They're very much like English
it/him/her/them.
>
> Huh! That's news to me. Either I missed that ruling/development, or
brain
> cells in charge of remembering it have been lax.
>
> ~mark
AFA-the-little-IK, I'm the only one to have used {ko'a} without it being
overtly
bound,so I don't think you've forgotten anything, but the description of
{ko'a}
that I gave is, I believe (& most others seem to agree), consistent with
the letter
& spirit of the Woldy Codex. I imagine it was Jorge who first realized
this.
--And. [I mean The Refgram, of course. - by the "codex", that is.]