[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component

To: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>
Subject: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
From: PILCH Hartmut <phm@A2E.DE>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:09:25 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
Cc: Lojban List <lojban@egroups.com>
Delivered-to: shoulson-kli@meson.org
Delivered-to: kli-mark@kli.org
Delivered-to: mailing list lojban@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005120237100.4895-100000@tam.n>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:lojban-unsubscribe@egroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com

> > Personally I interpret the spirit of Lojban as accepting modern
> > international standards (meters & kilograms, celsius, utc time, iso dates,
> > etc) unless a really good reason interferes. 
> I do the same. However the possible "good reasons" must be checked
> carefully first.

You might as well just "accept English as the international standard".
Why bother about creating a neutral language roots of diverse sources?

-phm


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/3/_/17627/_/958119175/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

References:
- Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
  - From: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: 24h counting
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread