[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New lujvo definitions in file area
- To: lojban@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: New lujvo definitions in file area
- From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 22:25:39 -0000
- In-reply-to: <062401c03449$813ba2c0$22191bc1@rus.ger.com>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
"Daniel Gudlat" wrote:
> > ga'ormolsna closed+mouth+sound: consonant:
>
> I don't like that one at all. For one thing (and I know I may be
going
> down the picky route here) only one consonant is pronounced with a
> closed mouth (m), and to me, "humming" is the most plausible parse
for
> this, in that it was the first to come to mind.
How about consonants being "jaksna" (narrow+sound) (sance lo jarki),
since a consonant is a sound producted when some part of the mouth is
narrowed. (s1 is a consonant produced at narrow place (of mouth)
j1=s2, narrow by standard j3 (j2 default)) That way the x2 could
differential between labials, dentals, velars, etc.
Similar, "vowel" could be "gansna" (sance lo ganra) (s1 is a vowel
produced at broad place (of mouth) g1=s2, broad by standard g3 (g2
default)). Likewise, x2 to specify front/back vowels and x3 I guess
for high/low vowels.
co'o mi'e adam