[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
literalism [was: Re: [lojban] Re: looking at arjlujv.txt
From: pycyn@aol.com
li'o
Literalism
TO LE SATCI LUJVO SE JINVI TOI
tends
to think in terms of a very small number of possibilities and then to
object
if a case does not fit any of those possibilities or even if another word
fits those possibilities better.
what i object to is the prospect of having to live with a dictionary full of
words that don't mean what they're supposed to mean. even if this sort of
semantic drift has occurred repeatedly in english (since e.g. the era of LA
GRANA DESKU), it is still possible to specify the register of english that
is being used, with key words not found outside it. i can see how the
shortened sort of lujvo might become, not "slang" (since that already
presupposes a lot of uses that don't yet exist in lojban) but something like
slang that signals its own context; however this distinction depends on
having the longer, more accurate forms available for the same meanings...
li'o
And most
ugly ones come about -- not strange to say
-- in the belief that they are being "accurate / literal / >definitional."
TOLMELBI FO MA --i can see a good case for, lojbanically, precision &
clarity seeming more beautiful than imprecision...
li'o
Probably one of the prides of
the old days, however, was "blade hammer" for "hatchet, ax".
Now, this is really becoming a discussion about kennings. Kennings, i'll be
the first to agree, are fascinating. But are they lojbanic? Would native
lojbanists, even, ever have wanted to go beyond SIMSA to full-fledged
metaphors?
And if we insist on using kennings, i still think MELA BRODA BRODE is the
cat's pyjamas.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.