Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Pierre Abbat wrote:

> I am making a table of fu'ivla tarmi and have hit a snag. Is CVCCVVCV a valid
> fu'ivla tarmi? It could break into CV CCVVCV, where CCVVCV is a known valid
> fu'ivla tarmi, but the rules don't say anything about fu'ivla breaking into
> fu'ivla.

The rules for valid fu'ivla are known to be incomplete.
It's clear to me, however, that anything which breaks up is not valid.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter