Re: [lojban] su'u

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

> > But no matter how many clear cases there are, as long as
> > there is one ambiguous case we have ambiguity.
> >
> >   do catlu be le nu mi klama
> >
> > could parse as: do (catlu be le nu mi) klama
> > or as: do catlu be le nu (mi klama)
>
> If that were true, then do catlu be le nu mi would parse, but it
> doesn't, at least not in jbofi'e.
>
> -Robin

Of course it doesn't parse, and it shouldn't, that's what I was
saying. If xod's use of {le nu <sumti>} were accepted, it would
create ambiguity, that's why it is not acceptable, and it does
not parse.

co'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.