[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] su'u



On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:


> So you're saying that 'do catlu be le nu mi klama' is _not_ ambiguous as
> the grammar stands, and that 'le nu {sumti}' is illegal to make sure
> that it's not ambiguous?

Is there an alternate explanation I'm not seeing?



-----
We do not like                                       And if a cat
those Rs and Ds,                                     needed a hat?
Who can't resist                                     Free enterprise
more subsidies.                                      is there for that!