Re: [lojban] su'u

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

> From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
>
> Note that John Cowan replied in the same fashion I did.  I really
> _sounded_ like you were insisting that the example sentences you
> presented were ambiguous.

I insisted that they would be ambiguous under xod's proposal,
not that they are with the curent grammar. John quoted me
completely out of context. This is what I wrote:

> la xod cusku di'e
>
> > No. However, I do not think a single sumti in an abstraction is
> > meaningless or ambiguous.
>
> I don't know about meaningless, but it would be ambiguous.
> {le nu mi klama} could mean {(le nu mi) klama} and
> {le nu (mi klama}.
>
> co'o mi'e xorxes




_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.