Re: [lojban] RE:su'u

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, And Rosta wrote:


> Thanks. I understand (maybe). I agree with pc, then, that there's a
> problem (and I also think that it is the "(me) la X" form (and the notion of
> reference) that is metaphysically faulty).


Metaphysically faulty? It is metaphysically faulty to interpret "me la
foo." "as x1 is refered to as foo"?


-----
We do not like                                       And if a cat
those Rs and Ds,                                     needed a hat?
Who can't resist                                     Free enterprise
more subsidies.                                      is there for that!