Re: [lojban] Re: [humanmarkup] Introducing the Logical Language Group

["michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>]

> From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
     li'o
> Naturally I am not
> proposing that HumanML be done directly in Lojban!

why not--first of all, how do we say "human markup" in lojban?
i confess i'm not familiar with the jargon that's taken from...
then, what's "XML"?

    li'o
> > Each paradigm in psychology and spirituality has a different way of
> > describing human characteristics--

so why reify any particular notation, even lojban's,  when there's
no useful consensus?


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com