Re: [lojban] The Dvorak of Lojban?

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:49:26PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:41:43PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:43:08PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > > > > >I use Dvorak, actually.  It is almost certainly better for lojban
> > > > > > >than
> > > > > > >Qwerty is, although lojban has a _lot_ more stuff for the left hand
> > > > > > >(vowels and ') to do without switching hands.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > {da'a slaka nenri tcana na.e}... especially {da'a} which requires
> > > > > > three pinky
> > > > > > strokes in a row. I move for exchanging {'} with {h}.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've been thinking about that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Question for the list as a whole:
> > > > >
> > > > > Would anyone be annoyed/find it confusing if some people used h instead
> > > > > of ' in the same way that some people drop . in written lojban?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I find both very irritating.
> > >
> > > Both h and ' or both (turning ' into h) and (dropping .)?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ha! Both deviations from the orthography used in the Book.
>
> Which is explicitely stated to be flexible.  Nice try.  8)


The book permits the use of alternate orthographies, but only one is used
in the examples.



>
> -Robin
>
> --
> http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
> Information wants to be free.  Too bad most of it is crap.  --RLP
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

-----
We do not like                                       And if a cat
those Rs and Ds,                                     needed a hat?
Who can't resist                                     Free enterprise
more subsidies.                                      is there for that!