la xod cusku di'e
> > > > .i ro selkrici cu jitfa no da > > > Actually, as written it says: For every belief x, there is no standard > by which x is false. > > What you meant (I presume) is: > > i no da cu se jitfa ro selkrici > > There is no standard such that every belief is false by it. How is it that you perform only a SE conversion but get such a different meaning?
Because the order of the quantifiers is reversed. "For every x there is no y such that..." is not the same as "There is no y such that for every x...". Logic 101 :) co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.