> >If y'all are going to insist that djuno makes a distinction between "to be
> >aware of the truth or factuality of" and "be convinced or certain of",
> >you're going to need to rewrite the definiton, because that is _not_
> >what the current definition says. The current definition being in
> >English, the meanings of the english words must be used.
>
> The current definition is NOT a single word, and the whole must be used to
> get the meaning. There MUST be an epistemology, which COULD be
> belief. But I can "know" something by one epistemology and "know" the
> exact opposite by a different epistemology, in Lojban.
That seems to be directly contradicting what John has been saying. I'm
fine with your interpretation, as it allows 'mi pu djuno' for something
I used to know but have been corrected on.