RE: [lojban] Re: toldjuno

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>]

pc:
> Somewhere recently xorxes noted that "know" at least has the peculiarity that
> to say someonne does not know x implies that x is true as much as to say that
> someone does know x.  He noted correctly that this does not carry over to
> {djuno}, since {na djuno} literally gives the disjunction of the denials of
> the conjunctive components of {djuno}, one of which is that the claimed
> knowledge is true.  So he proposed {toldjuno} for the corresponding
> expression.  I canot remember (nor find) whetehr he specificed its English,
> but it should be "x1 is ignorant of x2 about x3 in epistemology x4." It also
> has the condition that x2 is true in x4, like {djuno}:

Why "toldjuno" rather than "naldjuno", and what would "naldjuno" mean?

---And.