[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] RE:not only

At 01:21 PM 04/20/2001 -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 4/19/2001 5:54:44 PM Central Daylight Time,
lojbab@lojban.org writes:

.  One reason [for adopting the simple predicate form for colors, rather
than the comparative] was a realization from prototype theory that word
meanings
(especially of colors) simply are NOT comparative to a typical in nature,
but rather reflect closeness to an archtypical or prototypical concept of
blue.  Thus "blue" is "less non-blue than any non-blue object, or something
to that effect, though even this formulation may break down at the borders
between colors.


That is, a psychological theory about color recognition won out over a
linguistic theory about how color terms function in language.
Except that the prototype theory was supported by Kay and Kempton's research in the early 80s (that which seemed to support Sapir-Whorf), which makes it a linguistic theory as well. But I don't think we knew that when we chose the place structure.
I don't see how the comparatives were a linguistic theory either - at least not one supported by any natlang evidence.
Nora adds that the comparative version ignored the fact that all the rest of Loglan used categories/prototypes. Why should colors be comparatives and not tables? 
jubme as x1 is tablier than x2
Even among those things with a clearer scale like happy do not work well as comparatives "x1 is happier than x2 (about x3?) is rather beside the point. 


That sounds
familiar.  In any case we got rid of the Angstrom unit crew and the fights
between the red-blue-whatevers and the cyan-magenta-whatevers -- and the
color spindleists.


That indeed was another reason I forgot.


<Nora also had strong distaste for what is now "na se blanu", the negated
converse, which IIRC JCB attached special meaning to.>
I don't remember that but I do know what JCB could do with odd cases, so I
can imagine that as a powerful motive.
Nora clarifies that this had something to do with the default place filler. She added the example, that a green object can be described as blanu because it is bluer than a red object (because green contains blue in additive colors). But it is na blanu because it is not bluer than a blue object. And if you change from additive to subtractive colors, what is true changes. 

lojbab
--
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org