> I think that there is a difference between "nu prenu kei" cu valsi", and
> "la bitlz cu prenu". The latter would expand to 4 names linked by some
form
> of connective "and" (.e or joi or ce probably). The 3 quoted words are a
> unit which one cannot assume can be broken down, since order is
significant.
Does {la bitlz} mean (a) "each of those x such that I am calling x 'bitlz'",
or (b) "each member of the group that I am calling 'bitlz'", or (c) "the thing
I am calling 'bitlz'"? (a) wouldn't work, because I'm not calling Ringo
'bitlz'. (c) wouldn't work, because I'm calling the group 'bitlz', and
the group is not a minimal unit of person. (b) would work, but then
"la bitlz cu girzu" would, undesirably, be false.