[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] djataurte
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] djataurte
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:59:10 -0700
- In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010426021004.00c31d90@127.0.0.1>; from lojbab@lojban.org on Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:16:09AM -0400
- Mail-followup-to: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- References: <01042523234609.02780@neofelis> <4.3.2.7.2.20010426021004.00c31d90@127.0.0.1>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:16:09AM -0400, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> At 11:19 PM 04/25/2001 -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >I found "djataurte" in translations/alice/NEW_WORDS meaning "tart". This is a
> >fu'ivla, but it's a type 4,
>
> If it has a rafsi in the front, it is clearly intended to be a type 3.
>
> This is precisely the sort of word that MUST be a type 3 and not a type
> 4. After all, "tart" has three completely distinct meanings in English (a
> food, a flavor property, and a slang description of a woman with loose
> morals) and who knows how many its Lojban counterpart might have in all the
> world's languages. How can we say at this stage of usage which of the
> multiple meanings should apply to the type 4 wordform - only 1 is allowed.
>
> >so why does it begin with "dja"? Type 3 fu'ivla
> >shouldn't be made from CCV or CVV rafsi anyway.
>
> There is nothing illegal about using them - it just can't be assumed that
> the fu'ivla will be well-formed when one works with those rafsi.
As someone who knows very little about fu'ivla formation:
Is djataurte legal as it stands or not? If not, what do we do with it?
It's supposed to refer to the food, btw.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/