[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Predicate logic and childhood.
At 03:47 PM 04/30/2001 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:44:27PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> At 02:48 PM 04/30/2001 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >2. What is the use of conditionals other than .e?
>
> Well, "a" expressing alternation (and anai for conditional) has a pretty
> clear usage, and onai for exclusive-or does as well.
anai does not have a clear usage, or we wouldn't be having this
discussion.
It has a clear meaning and usage, but it just happens that this clear
meaning and usage is NOT that of the colloquial language "conditional",
which is usually a time or causal connection. There are times when it is
the right thing to use, and this again is going to be mostly about logical
arguments wherein statements could either be true or false and it is
indeterminate for purposes of the argument which is the case. For
statements about reality, we are generally ONLY concerned with true
statements and do not generally express false ones without explicitly
marking them as hypotheticals or suppositionals or counterfactuals of some
kind.
> But the use of logical connectives in general is based on the
> assumption, probably false, that language is attempting to express
> logical truth. By insisting that the language connectives follow the
> rules of logic strictly, people will either start thinking in a manner
> that reflects those rules or they will avoid the use of connectives
> (or they will break the rules). This is a key design feature for the
> original purpose of the language as a test of Sapir-Whorf, though I
> personally think that the formal logical aspects of Lojban don't come
> into play enough that it will matter much.
Thank you for failing to answer the question. 8)
You're welcome $%)
No-one has yet managed to tell me what possible use, in actual
communication, things like o and anai have.
.anai is probably a proper usage to translate "If wishes were horses, then
beggars would ride". My wife and I HAVE used .anai and na.a on occasion in
Lojban conversation. "o" is possibly useful when one wants to say that two
sentences mean essentially the same thing or would be true under the same
conditions; I am not sure that I have ever used it unless it fell out of an
onai involving a negation.
But you seem to be denying the possibility that logical argument is a valid
purpose of "actual communication". Political discussions seem like ripe
possibilities for logical connectives. But political discussions are not
statements about reality, but rather about ideas, so that the truth
conditions are somewhat more uncertain than when you are telling your kid
what to do.
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org