[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parsing
> >
--- In lojban@y..., Richard Curnow <richard@r...> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 06:24:09AM -0000, A.W.T. wrote:
> {bau la lojban tavla do} is not a bridi tail. The grouping of 2) is
> like this
>
> ((mi) (bau la lojban)) (tavla do)
> term term selbri tail-term
> terms bridi-tail
>
> so (bau la lojban) is part of the 'terms', before the bridi-tail has
> even begun. For 1), 2) and 3), the bridi-tail is respectively
>
> 1) tavla do bau la lojban.
> 2) tavla do
> 3) tavla
>
> > Is there a rule explicitely stating in the Book that only bridi-tails *starting with a selbri* are allowed after {gi'e}?
> >
>
> Pretty much. You might get "ke", "bo", "ge" or
> simple-tense-modal+"gi"/"ke"/"bo" between gi'e and the selbri.
je'e .i ckire
co'o mi'e .aulun.