[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Parsing



> > 
--- In lojban@y..., Richard Curnow <richard@r...> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 06:24:09AM -0000, A.W.T. wrote:

> {bau la lojban tavla do} is not a bridi tail.  The grouping of 2) is
> like this
> 
>   ((mi) (bau la lojban)) (tavla   do)
>    term term              selbri  tail-term
>    terms                  bridi-tail
> 
> so (bau la lojban) is part of the 'terms', before the bridi-tail has
> even begun.  For 1), 2) and 3), the bridi-tail is respectively
> 
> 1) tavla do bau la lojban.
> 2) tavla do
> 3) tavla
> 
> > Is there a rule explicitely stating in the Book that only bridi-tails *starting with a selbri* are allowed after {gi'e}?
> > 
> 
> Pretty much.  You might get "ke", "bo", "ge" or
> simple-tense-modal+"gi"/"ke"/"bo" between gi'e and the selbri.

je'e .i ckire

co'o mi'e .aulun.