[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Normal
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Normal
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:33:20 -0400
- In-reply-to: <0106221042350D.02301@neofelis>
- References: <E15DHzP-0000RM-00@mercury.ccil.org> <E15DHzP-0000RM-00@mercury.ccil.org>
At 01:02 PM 06/22/2001 -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, John Cowan wrote:
>Pierre Abbat scripsit:
>
>> Does {cnano} mean "norm" or "average"? How would you express "The average
>> height of the river is normally two meters, but now it's six, and they
don't
>> follow a normal distribution"?
>
>I think it can be applied to any measure of central tendency, and
>then one can coin lujvo for mean, median, mode, etc.
Okay, how about cafna'o for mode,
cafrai
porna'o for median,
pormidju
kajna'o for mean,
I'd use sujna'o; I think there is more than one kind of calculated mean. I
suggest the above for the arithmetic mean, we'd need something else for the
geometric mean.
and na'orcu'o for the normal distribution?
It'd have to be na'orselcu'o or as you note below it will be an oblique place.
The first three have x1, x2, x3 of
cnano; na'orcu'o is less obvious:
na'orcu'o: x1 is random under conditions x2, with normal distribution x3, with
mean x4 and standard deviation x5
I rather doubt that you can get that from the lujvo place structure
conventions %^); mathematicians would probably prefer the use of variance
to standard deviation.
But the problem with this is that it ignores dozens of other random
distributions that are NOT normal. (One of the listings I found under
normal distribution using www.xrefer.com, my newly discovered site for all
the things I've forgotten since college) indicates there are several dozen
mathematical distributions with names. Of these, the Poisson/binomial
distribution is the most well known to me which is random also. Looking at
the definition of the normal distribution, mijna'omirtamra'i selcu'o would
be more accurate if verbose (and I see no reason why the two parts have to
be combined into a single word), but I would be inclined to just use cunrgauso.
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org