[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Normal

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Normal
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:56:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20010622130038.02d6ea70@postoffice.pacbell.net>
References: <E15DHzP-0000RM-00@mercury.ccil.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20010622130038.02d6ea70@postoffice.pacbell.net>
Reply-to: phma@oltronics.net
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>I would suggest  the place structure
>
>na'orcu'o: x1 is random with a normal distribution, and has mean x2, and SD x3
>
>I believe that this order reflects the frequency of use of the places, and 
>I don't see the value of a "conditions" place. The conditions on x1 can be 
>expressed within the statement of x1. There is only one normal 
>distribution, and it is specified entirely by its mean and SD.

But then how would you say that something *is* a normal distribution?

phma

References:
- Re: [lojban] Normal
  - From: Edward Cherlin <edward.cherlin.sy.67@aya.yale.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Normal
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Normal
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Normal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread