Re: [lojban] Rafsi in cmene

[Björn Gohla <b.gohla@gmx.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 08 July 2001 02:14, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> Pierre has pointed out to me that cmene like vocac. are misleading for
> hours, because cac. is not a rafsi of cacra. To be consistent with the
> other time milestones, this would mean vocacr. instead.
>
> 1) Do we want to inflict unpronouncables like vocacr. on our audience? (My
> take is, why not --- I'm now saying 12-hour time is dispreferred anyway,
> and vocacr. is not that much more unpronouncable than la .r,l)

looks very pronouncable to me, provided syllabic l and r (as in sanskrit) are 
permitted. 

- -- 
- --------------------
/* Nobody will ever see this message :-) */
panic("Cannot initialize video hardware\n");
	2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/atari/atafb.c
pub  1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger) 
<b.gohla@gmx.de>
     Key fingerprint = 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5  8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub  1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7SC6abBQ8OYNPSXYRAhNYAJ46FYMZ4986h5FFLjbIOM2UFVmy4wCfT0LD
+PYOV2BwB2q9Zp3LC8+XM8s=
=Dppw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----