[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: Editorial comment
la adam cusku di'e
"vo'a", like a second, unquantified "da", indicates each of the
referents of the original members of the set parallelly, i.e.
ci da poi prenu cu viska da/vo'a
Three people see themself.
le ci prenu cu viska vo'a
The three people see themself.
(each see themself, a sees a, b sees b, and c sees c.)
I think that works.
If vo'a (the first time) or da (the second+ time) are quantified, then
it takes the specified number from the original set. So:
ci da poi prenu cu viska ro da
Three people see all people. (where set the taken from is the set of
all people)
That's what I would like, yes.
ci da poi prenu cu viska ro vo'a
Three people see each of them. (where the set taken from is the
aforementioned three people.)
le ci prenu cu viska ro vo'a
The three people see each of them (a sees a,b,c, etc.)
I think the last one works. I'm not yet sure about the other one.
Let's investigate some more:
There's a strong parallel between quantifiers and logical
connectors: ro - e, su'o - a, pa - onai.
Let's see first what happens with the connectors:
la djan e la meris viska ro vo'a
Each of John and Mary sees each of John and Mary.
Hopefully that one is uncontroversial.
la djan a la meris viska ro vo'a
What does that one mean? I want it to mean that at least one
of them sees both of them.
la djan onai la meris viska ro vo'a
What does that one mean? I want it to mean that only one of them
sees both of them.
But whatever these last two mean, I think they should be equivalent
to:
su'o le re prenu cu viska ro vo'a
and:
pa le re prenu cu viska ro vo'a
So my preference is that {ro vo'a} refers to {ro le re prenu}
always, independently of what quantifier {le re prenu} has in
front when it appears in the x1.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp