[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] ctelr zei kemxasybakni

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] ctelr zei kemxasybakni
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:05:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <6b.1a18e519.28c68730@aol.com>
References: <6b.1a18e519.28c68730@aol.com>
Reply-to: phma@oltronics.net
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 15:36, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> Uff-da!  A vital part of the question?
> German, for both the Jay and the Sea-cow (which is the point here, I
> supose).

Which is correct: {ctelr. zei kemxasybakni} or {ctelr. zei xasybakni}? I'm 
thinking of adding a page about it. If I say {ro ctelr. zei kemxasybakni be 
la'o ly. Hydrodamalis gigas .ly}, that implies that there might have been 
other species, right? So how should I say "All Steller's sea cows 
(Hydrodamalis gigas)"?

Did anyone collect vitus statistics?

phma

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ctelr zei kemxasybakni
  - From: "Evgueni Sklyanin" <eks2@york.ac.uk>

References:
- Re: [lojban] ctelr (?) zei kemxasybakni
  - From: pycyn@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] specificity of 'ma'
Next by Date: Questions and observations about taxonomy
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] ctelr (?) zei kemxasybakni
Next by thread: Re: ctelr zei kemxasybakni
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread