Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la xod cusku di'e

> > That's the same as {mi claxu ro fipybirka} then.
>
> Why do you think this is clumsy? I think it's a great example of how to
> express oneself in a Logical Language.

It's not really what I mean when I say that I lack fins.
Would you say, for example, pointing to a fin of a fish in
a fishbowl, "I lack that fin"? Because that would be part of
the {ro fipybirka} claim. I think that's icky more than clumsy.

Anyway, And's {no da fipybirka mi} is clearly the best way to
say it.

> And does {mi claxu lo'e fipybirka}
> leave open that {mi tolclaxu na'ebo lo'e fipybirka}?

"I have other-than fins"? Of course. Why shouldn't it?

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp