[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mark on wiki on lerfu
--- In lojban@y..., pycyn@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 9/8/2001 5:45:03 PM Central Daylight Time,
> jjllambias@h... writes:
>
>
> > Actually, there's lots more: last, lasp, lask, lact, latc, laks,
> > lank, lart, and so on are all single-syllable too.
All unnecessary, with lerfu.
Moreover, while I suppose you CAN do this sort of thing, it's sort
of cheating, in the opposite direction of what I was talking about,
using {mark.bu} instead of {la mark.} "lank" (or rather "la nk.")
is "something named nk." Well, then, it should be something with
that name! To be sure, the speaker, as te cmene, has the right to
name anything whatever he likes, but this abuse of that power. And
since "goi" is symmetric, with only relative unassignedness to show
which side gets overwritten by the other, using a *named thing* on
one side might upset that balance. ("wait, he's saying that the
woman is really this NK person? Maybe NK isn't a woman but he wants
to call it that?) Anyway, that's what variables are for, not names.
>
> Gringe. Can someone remind me of the point of this, please. Why
would we
> want all these horrors, assigned or not? The maximum effective
anaphora is
> going to contain maybe half-a-dozen connections tops; beyond that
we cannot
> either remember or calculate the reference, whence the slogan
"Repetition is
> also anaphora." It is nice to ahve all these tools available for
choices,
> but we do not need them to do the work (we don't even need the
fo'V set,
> rpobably, as witness there heavy use so far.)
Well, I think I'd argue that given the heavier mnemonicity of
lerfu-based anaphora, we can probably go over that half-dozen limit
pretty safely. If you have a bunch of people/things with unique
one- or two-letter initials that you bind, it's not too hard to keep
track of them. Another example of how lerfu-variables rule and
ko'a, um, doesn't. (fo'[aei] are the only ones that DO have an
excuse to still be used: they have rafsi)
~mark