[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Sane and Rational date format (was: (from lojban-beginners) pi'e



At 06:16 PM 9/13/01 -0400, Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, James F. Carter wrote:

> > I think that when dates and times are combined, and they are all numeric, the
> > order should be year, month, day, hour, minute, second.
>
> I agree.  ISO 8601 specifies dates in the following variant formats:
>
>     ccyymmdd          19991231
>     ccyymmddhhmmss    19991231235959
>     ccyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss       1999-12-31 23:59:59
>       And trimming any of the time parts from either end, if unambiguous.

Which it usually is. I can't leave off the century, and report the time my computer says it is locally: 0109141131 could equally be January 9 of some unspecified year at 14:11:31.

> As international relations (of the positive kind) grow and strengthen it is
> important that partners be able to interchange data, specifically digital
> records containing ISO-8859-x encoded dates.  All cultures are going to
> have to give up their idiosyncratic date formats and adopt a common
> standard, of which ISO-8601 is the presently obvious one, besides being
> totally serviceable in my opinion.

Except that no human being uses it. I've never had anyone respond to a question as to the date who gave me the time as well. USUALLY when I ask for the date from a human, I get the month specified by name rather than number - I use numbers as an abbreviation in filling out forms.

I'm not opposed to world standards, but this simply isn't one for real human beings, only for computers.

It is a compatible standard, and it is simple to understand without weird
internal reversals of endianism, following a single rule. These arguments
seem to override invocations of tradition. detri4 can be filled to clue in
the readers that cuvjdikapoi is being used.

Certainly if someone wants to use a non-Lojbanic date format, it can be marked in the date place. I would use tarmi in the lujvo though, maybe tedmartai. Or of course la .isobixanopam.

But I probably won't.

lojbab
--
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org